GoodCase.aiAI News · Radar↗AI Map↗Course · LearnPrompt↗
ProjectsGoodCase.aiAI News Radar ↗AI Map ↗LearnPrompt ↗
GoodCase.aiGoodCase.aiAI Prompt Case Collection
GoodCase.ai
RankingsCasesSkillsFavoritesSubmitDailyJoin us
中文EN
Agent Access →

Projects

AI News · Radar ↗AI Map ↗Course · LearnPrompt ↗
GoodCase.aiGoodCase.aiAI Prompt Case Collection
RankingsCasesSkillsFavoritesSubmitDailyJoin us
中文EN
Agent Access →

Loading…

GoodCase.ai · AI Prompt Case Collection
DSH PluginsChangelogFeedback
ModelsCreatorsSeedance 2.5Seedance 2.0GPT Image 2GeminiNano Banana ProClaudeClaude Opus 5.5Grok ImagineVeoKlingQwen ImageGPT Image 1.5MiniMax H3
A Galaxy in a Teacup: Macro Photography

A Galaxy in a Teacup: Macro Photography

Creator · TheAmmadFiles

AI ImageX2026-07-22Added 07/28/2026Independently retestedGPT Image 2
View original source ↗
Source ♥ 79

Prompt

A hyper-realistic macro shot of a {argument name="cup type" default="delicate porcelain teacup"} sitting on a {argument name="surface type" default="wooden table"}. Instead of tea, the cup contains an {argument name="celestial contents" default="entire spiral galaxy with glowing nebulae, orbiting planets, tiny astronauts floating between stars, and miniature comets streaking across space"}. The swirling galaxy reflects on the rim of the cup. Cinematic lighting, impossible object, photorealistic, masterpiece, 8K.
≡Provenance · verifiedPublished prompts are human-checked against the original post; platform-reconstructed prompts are not accepted.Compare with source ↗

Models & stability

Recommended models

GPT Image 2
Stability
93 / 100
Cost
Medium

Independent retest evidence

See what the same prompt generated in our test.

Retest output · not the creator's original
ImageGenerated evidenceAI judged

Grok Imagine

Sep 2, 2026

Retest score92.6
Generated retest result
claude-sonnet-5 · 92.7gpt-5.6-sol · 92.5gap · 0.2
  • Cross-model retest: the recommended model is GPT Image 2, and this run used Grok Imagine. The result shows how the same prompt carries over to Grok Imagine; it does not show what the creator got with the original model.
  • The retest score is the mean of two AI judges (0–100) for this single generation. No person has reviewed it, and it is not a success rate.

The requested model is recorded, but the generation receipt did not expose a verifiable underlying model ID.

ImageGenerated evidenceAI judged

GPT Image 2

Aug 9, 2026

Retest score95.3
Generated retest result
claude-sonnet-5 · 93.2gpt-5.6-sol · 97.3gap · 4.1
  • Same model family as recommended (GPT Image 2). Settings the creator used beyond the prompt are not known.
  • The retest score is the mean of two AI judges (0–100) for this single generation. No person has reviewed it, and it is not a success rate.

The requested model is recorded, but the generation receipt did not expose a verifiable underlying model ID.

Keep exploring

Explore related cases.

View all AI Image Case →

Same model

Latest with GPT Image 2 →

  • Woman in Sunglasses Stands in Platform Wind as a Train Rushes PastAI Image · GPT Image 2.5 · 2026-10-28
  • Blue-Line Couple with Golden Hearts on Cream PaperAI Image · GPT Image 2.5 · 2026-10-27
  • Hand-Drawn Paper Cover with a Small Scene and Ample Blank SpaceAI Image · GPT Image 2.5 · 2026-10-24
  • Warmly Lit Portrait of a Black-Haired Woman by a Café WindowAI Image · GPT Image 2.5 · 2026-10-24
  • Six Flash Portraits of a Young Portuguese WomanAI Image · GPT Image 2.5 · 2026-10-23
  • Portrait of a Curly-Haired Woman in Champagne Gown and Floral PearlsAI Image · GPT Image 2.5 · 2026-10-21

Each detail page keeps the original result, the prompt, and retest evidence in one reading path.