GoodCase.aiAI News · Radar↗AI Map↗Course · LearnPrompt↗
ProjectsGoodCase.aiAI News Radar ↗AI Map ↗LearnPrompt ↗
GoodCase.aiGoodCase.aiAI Prompt Case Collection
GoodCase.ai
RankingsCasesSkillsFavoritesSubmitDailyJoin us
中文EN
Agent Access →

Projects

AI News · Radar ↗AI Map ↗Course · LearnPrompt ↗
GoodCase.aiGoodCase.aiAI Prompt Case Collection
RankingsCasesSkillsFavoritesSubmitDailyJoin us
中文EN
Agent Access →

Loading…

GoodCase.ai · AI Prompt Case Collection
DSH PluginsChangelogFeedback
ModelsCreatorsSeedance 2.5Seedance 2.0GPT Image 2GeminiNano Banana ProClaudeClaude Opus 5.5Grok ImagineVeoKlingQwen ImageGPT Image 1.5MiniMax H3

Glitch Art Multi-Dimensional Face Transformation

Creator · Ushizaru_LAB

AI VideoX2026-07-26Added 07/28/2026Independently retested#human-reviewed
More tags (1)
Seedance 2.0
View original source ↗
Source ♥ 80

Prompt

After a rhythmic approach like stop-motion, a glitch video that aggressively moves back and forth between completely different dimensions (2D⇔3D), such as 3D CG, live action, 2000s anime, and pixel art, without minding if the facial structure changes. It ends with a browser-crasher-like screen collapse. Video concept: Completely eliminate smooth camera movement. The camera approaches the face in stages (jump cuts) to the rhythm of “Pa! Pa! Pa!” After the approach, the girl's face does not need to preserve its “original features.” The entire screen is pulled in and keeps being violently swapped (moving back and forth) through hard cuts into “completely different art styles and dimensions (2D⇔3D),” such as dimensional 3D CG, raw live action, a 2000s-style anime beautiful girl, and flat retro pixel art. Camera and editing policy: [Extremely important: Smooth changes and zoom-ins are absolutely not allowed. The sequence must be composed of stop-motion-like jump-cut approaches and “complete switching” into art styles from different dimensions.] 0.0–3.0 seconds: [Stop-motion approach] Start from the first shot. Instead of the camera moving smoothly closer, it approaches the face in stages with jump cuts at a steady rhythm every 0.5 seconds: “Pa! Pa! Pa! Pa!” At the moment each cut switches, strong chromatic aberration (RGB shift) noise runs across the image. 3.0–8.0 seconds: [Dimensional collapse; complete art-style replacement] Reach an extreme close-up of the face. From here, the rendering style of the video itself keeps crackling and switching (moving back and forth) every 0.5 to 1 second, without concern for changes in the facial structure. It is forcibly swapped with flashes into completely different art styles that cross between 3D and 2D dimensions, such as “dimensional polygonal 3D CG” → “ultra-high-definition live-action human” → “2000s-style cel anime beautiful girl character (2D)” → “completely flat retro pixel art (2D).” 8.0–10.0 seconds: [Browser-crasher-like collapse ending] The violent back-and-forth between art styles exceeds the processing limit, and the video completely collapses. Using the face footage as an underlay, “massive error windows,” “video panels with different visual expressions,” and “vividly colored block noise” keep popping up chaotically in multilayered layers like a browser crasher. The entire screen is completely filled with a buggy video collage, becoming a chaotic collapse screen that retains none of the original video's form. Constraints: During the midsection art-style changes, “smooth changes that try to preserve the original face silhouette” are absolutely unnecessary. The structure may change, so violently repeat “complete hard cuts (swaps)” many times into rendering styles from different dimensions: “dimensional (3D)” and “flat (2D),” as well as “live action” and “2000s anime.”
≡Provenance · verifiedPublished prompts are human-checked against the original post; platform-reconstructed prompts are not accepted.Compare with source ↗

Models & stability

Recommended models

Seedance 2.0
Stability
74 / 100
Cost
Medium

Independent retest evidence

See what the same prompt generated in our test.

Retest output · not the creator's original
VideoGenerated evidenceAI judged

MiniMax H3 Max 768p

Sep 7, 2026

Retest score73.5
Your browser does not support video playback.
claude-sonnet-5 · 67.8gpt-5.6-sol · 79.2gap · 11.4
  • Cross-model retest: the recommended model is Seedance 2.0, and this run used MiniMax H3 Max 768p. The result shows how the same prompt carries over to MiniMax H3 Max 768p; it does not show what the creator got with the original model.
  • The retest score is the mean of two AI judges (0–100) for this single generation. No person has reviewed it, and it is not a success rate.

Model and resolution follow the provider task receipt.

Keep exploring

Explore related cases.

View all AI Video Case →

Same model

Latest with Seedance 2.0 →

  • Blue-Haired Woman Runs Back as a Scooter Rider Loses Balance and FallsAI Video · Seedance 2.0 · 2026-10-27
  • A Young Korean Woman’s Peaceful Day in SeoulAI Video · Seedance 2.0 · 2026-10-24
  • White-Clad Acrobat Leaps Across Tall Poles Above a Mountain LakeAI Video · Seedance 2.0 · 2026-10-23
  • Woman Grows Bodybuilder Arms After Picking Up a Can in a SupermarketAI Video · Seedance 2.0 · 2026-10-23
  • A Black-Haired Woman Escapes a War-Torn City with a RifleAI Video · Seedance 2.0 · 2026-10-23
  • A Melancholic Woman Lying Among Scattered Sheet MusicAI Video · Seedance 2.0 · 2026-10-23

Each detail page keeps the original result, the prompt, and retest evidence in one reading path.